Collateral Peer To Peer Closes Its Doors
** Updated “are lenders creditors” section, June 21st, 2018 **
Collateral has been court-appointed into administration due to an FCA regulation permissions
Collateral has ceased trading less than two years of opening its peer to peer lending doors in May 2016. Collateral received strong lender support from its beginnings as a jewellery pawn-broking style lender lending to its maturity as a property development and bridging loan facilitator. I had high hopes for Collateral and was ultimately shocked to hear about its shutdown.
For full disclosure, I have 5% of my net peer to peer lending invested in Collateral’s loans.
Who Is Administering Collaterals Affairs And Loan Book?
Shane Crooks & Mark Shaw (They will not take telephone enquiries)
On the 27th of April 2018, the FCA successfully persuaded the court system that Refresh Recovery’s appointment as Administrator was “invalid”. BDO was named as the new Administrator.
What The Heck Happened To Collateral??
I previously called Refresh Recovery (Collateral’s previous Administrator), for an update and here’s the information I can share.
Collateral was supposedly forced into administration by the Financial Conduct Authority for operating without FCA permissions. Collateral believed they were operating under FCA permission when in fact they were not which makes me question the competency of the people in charge. Collateral will not be opening their doors again. It is certainly an unusual turn of events.
The newly appointed Joint Administrators, BDO, are officers of the court and will work to act in the interest of Collateral, creditors, lenders and borrowers. There is no word on whether BDO will be able to achieve full repayment of capital and interest owed to lenders.
Collateral was operating profitably and had an excess of client account funds. Unfortunately, £390,000 of those funds were withdrawn by Collateral as “company profits” starting February 2018. Hopefully, those funds can be tracked and recovered.
Are Lenders Considered Collateral Creditors?
The administrator has now an initial view that all lenders will be treated as creditors. This is because Collateral’s company acting as the lenders’ agent and issuing loan agreements, was deemed as FCA unauthorised and therefore, loan agreements with unregulated agents are unenforceable.
Although not currently required, lenders may need to provide proof of their financial investments and loan holdings within the Collateral platform. Most investors I have spoken with would need access to Collateral’s date to determine which and how much of the loans they held. This is an issue since Collateral’s website is no longer online. The Administrator sent out a report on June 21st, 2018 stating that advancements have been made to recover the loan holdings data held on third party servers. This is positive news because without this data, it would be difficult to identify loans.
What Happens Next?
BDO continues its full investigation and audit of Collateral. This process could take a long time as BDO will need to understand Collateral’s loans, investor funds, and track financial transactions. BDO will continue to collect loan repayments on behalf of lenders.
There is no word on whether or not these loan repayments will be distributed to lenders.
BDO could work with other peer to peer lending companies to sell Collateral’s loan book.
You can read updates on the Collateral situation on BDO’s website.
Isn’t Having An Administrator In Charge A Good Thing?
Yes. Administrators are put in place by the courts to oversee company failure or insolvency. The FCA stepped in to protect the interests of both lenders and borrowers.
Fees and administration costs are becoming a major issue. BDO’s fees as of June 21st, 2018 are already £36,463.23 and the administration process is still in its infant stage. How expensive will the legal and administration fees be in order to manage the loan book and continue the payment collections? Things could become markedly worse if additional defaults occur. The estimated Administration fees are £500,000. This money will likely be paid from Collateral’s estate.
Is There Any Money Left In Collateral And What Happens To This Money?
According to reports, Collateral held funds totaling £395,404 which included deposits totaling £370,553 from 777 people. Collateral collected a full loan terms interest in advance so that may bode well for lenders if Collateral acted honestly and correctly. This and any other uninvested money should be held aside and used to pay the administrators fees and to repay lenders.
In February 2018, these funds were withdrawn from the client account. A full investigation is being conducted to find out what happened to these funds.
What About The Loan Book?
Refresh Recovery reports that Collateral has outstanding loans of £15,624,628 secured by property valued at £23,552,400.
What About Other Assets?
Refresh Recovery reported that Collateral has outstanding loans of £1,678,071 secured by assets valued at £2,478,336 These assets include jewellery, vehicles, antiques and art. These assets are being held by the administrator.
Could Another Peer To Peer Company Step In?
Possibly and in an interesting move, Bondmason has offered to assist Collateral. You can read more about this here.
According to Refresh Recovery, it has received more than 15 expressions of interest in buying all or part of Collateral’s loan book.
It would be expected for other peer to peer lending companies to step in and help. It’s in the sectors best interest for the Collateral situation to be handled correctly to provide investor confidence in the wind-up process. If not, lenders investing through other peer to peer companies might run for the exits, creating a panic.
It may not be in the best interests of the administrator or Collateral to accept this help as this becomes a financial matter.
What Are My Personal Thoughts / Should Investors Be Concerned?
Anytime a company closes its doors is a cause for concern. As more information is revealed, the more I’m troubled. Firstly, Collateral’s website stated the shutdown was an IT technical issue and that the site would be back up “shortly”. This was the first obvious untruth.
After reading the April 27th, 2018 court discussions including disclosure of almost £400,000 being withdrawn from Collateral’s client bank accounts directly into the accounts of one of Collateral owners, I think this administrator replacement was a good move by the FCA designed to protect investors. It remains to be seen how much of investors funds will be returned. will see their capital returned.
At first, I was concerned how the FCA was stepping in to impose their choice of the administrator but have now changed my opinion as it turned out the FCA knew more about the situation and was acting in the best interests of investors, lenders and creditors.
When I first decided to invest through Collateral, I had communicated with one of the owners and through my research, I believed the management was competent and the company was built to succeed. I studied Collateral for some time before I invested and knew the risks of investing through Collateral, being that it was a smaller peer to peer lending company with no operating history. However the returns I was receiving more than outweighed the risks.
I would like to believe that Collateral’s owners were operating their business with integrity but true character is tested when poo starts hitting the fan. It will be very interesting to discover what happened to the £390,000 that was withdrawn from client accounts. More will be revealed after BDO’s investigation.
As much as it pains me to see a peer to peer company go out of business, I knew it would happen one day. I think it will trigger other companies into cleaning up their acts and making sure all their legal, regulatory, data and financial obligations are in order.
Diversify Diversify Diversify!
Collateral’s closure is a good reminder of how important diversification is within any investment sector. This is the reason I invest through multiple different peer to peer and crowdlending companies. If one fails, it doesn’t have a hugely detrimental impact on my overall portfolio.
What Can We Learn
Lenders are now learning that assumptions could be costly. I as a lender assumed that Collateral was being run as an FCA regulated company and that all data was being held securely and being backed up. Neither of these assumptions proved to be true.
It would certainly prudent for lenders of other peer to peer and crowdlending companies make sure they hold their own loan information in case the worst happens.
Collateral’s situation is extremely complicated and will take time to be settled.
I will update this page as I receive more information.
If you enjoyed this page and want to learn more about peer to peer lending, click here and receive my complimentary Top 5 Peer to Peer Lending Sites Report.
I love feedback, so if you find any errors, omissions or have any improvement suggestions, I invite you to contact me and be a part of contributing to this website.
Disclaimers: I’m not paid by or employed by Collateral p2p or any of the companies I write about. In most cases, I have invested or continue to invest my own money through these companies. The sign-up links on this website are referral links. When you sign up for an account through my website, I receive a referral fee directly from the companies, at no cost to you. Your support enables me to continue to operate the Financial Thing website. You can read more about my referral links here.
** This page is for information purposes only and should not be considered investment advice. Opinions expressed on this page are mine only. All information was deemed to be correct at the time of writing. Please consult legal advice before taking any course of action. Peer to peer lending contains risks so never invest more than you can afford to lose. **